I spent much of my youth watching Godzilla, Ultraman, Voltron, Giant Robo, Mazinger Z and other various Creature Features. I had tons of these toys, and still own about 10 Godzilla films on DVD at present. I've long wished for that big budget epic of any of these properties, and no, Roland Emmerich's Godzilla does not count. I do have hopes for the upcoming Godzilla film though. You can imagine my excitement when seeing the various trailers and spots for Pacific Rim. I finally get to see giant robots fight giant creatures in the way I've always dreamed!
The kid in me loved Pacific Rim on that front. It delivers on exactly what it advertised. However, if you watch Pacific Rim and come away from it thinking it's an awful piece of shit, then I wouldn't be able to disagree with you. Nearly every other aspect of Pacific Rim is a mess (I'll get to that). Some of this is a byproduct of the style though. Pacific Rim is basically a big budget B movie or Midnight Monster Movie. It's nothing more than a kids film, and it even feels like a toy commercial at times.
If you're hoping this may lead to a influx of more of these films, this is where I think Pacific Rim was a missed opportunity. It doesn't do anything to transcend the genre. I don't see many guys that will be able to drag their wives or girlfriends to this. There just isn't any appeal outside of fathers and sons. I had hoped that Guillermo del Toro would have tried to reach out to a wider audience, but those looking for a better story or interesting characters won't be able to get past the general cheesiness.
The entire backstory of Pacific Rim is laid out in the opening prologue. Aliens opens a dimensional rift in the Pacific Ocean and begin to send giant monsters, called Kaiju, through it on a regular schedule. There doesn't seem to be any purpose to it other than to cause destruction. The monsters progressively become larger and more powerful, so the world's governments put aside their differences and coordinate to build giant robots called Jaegers. Initially these were controlled by a single pilot, but it's found that the neural load was too much for a single person, so they are operated by pairs of people that have their minds linked together, called "drifting". This is not to be confused with Tokyo Drifting.
The action picks up several years into the conflict and things aren't looking good for humanity. The Kaiju are getting stronger and attacking more frequently, and we're running out of Jaegers. In a last ditch attempt to stop them, the remaining Jaegers are pooled and a plan is formed to close the rift. Becket (Charlie Hunnam), a former Jaeger pilot that's moved on after the death of this brother is asked to step back into his old Jaeger. That's pretty much the entire plot.
While I liked that Pacific Rim didn't waste too much time with backstory and throws us right into the action, I also wanted to see more of the early days of the Jaeger program and successes. There were several generations of Jaegers, but you don't get to see all of them or learn what they improved with each version. By the time of the events in Pacific Rim, there are only about five Jaegers left. It would have been awesome to see a large force of these all on screen at once fighting multiple monsters. I realize the budget of the film might not allowed that, but even a short, wide shot of an early epic battle would have been a sight to behold.
Instead, we're coming into to the story as the Jaegerr program is being shut down due to decreasing effectiveness. These Jaegers don't last very long in a fight. Some are so ineffective that it's hard to understand why they ever went this direction in the first place. Wouldn't it have been more efficient to use the same resources to build up a large arsenal of huge missiles, mines and other weaponry to combat them? Things that didn't require pilots or could be controlled remotely? Yeah, I know that's not as fun, and there'd be no movie otherwise. Forget it. We came to see giant robots versus giant monsters!
Again, this is the success of Pacific Rim. The action and special effects are fan-friggin-tastic! Everything is colorful, the Kaiju and Jaegers all have interesting and unique looks about them. You get to see robots vs monster action throughout the film, and there are some great, creative fights. However, this brings me to one of the things that bugged me about Pacific Rim. There are more than a few times where you can't tell what's going on. It's not as bad as something like Transformers, but most of these battles occur at night, and in water, and are shot too close. You never really get to have a good, long look at either the Kaiju or the Jaegers. With all the design that went into them, it would be nice to be able to appreciate that more. Just pause on a wide shot for an extra second or two.
As I've mentioned, there's not much to the plot and it's a pretty self-contained story. There's no attempt to setup or even hint at a sequel or something coming next. Part of me appreciates that, but when discussing after with my friend, we both thought the movie would have been better if it had been framed similar to how The Princess Bride was told. You could have had a retired Jaeger pilot telling his son or grandson the tale as a bedtime story. At the end when the kid says something like, "Wow! That was amazing!" They could end the film with the pilot saying something like, "Oh yeah? Well, wait until I tell you about what happened next!" Then you could pretty much go crazy with anything you want in the sequel. It doesn't mean they won't make one if it does well enough, but it felt like another missed opportunity to me.
I don't mind the thin plot since I wasn't watching Pacific Rim for that, but I was annoyed by all the various and unnecessary character threads. This really drug the middle part of the film down, and didn't add anything or made me care about the characters. Just get to the next fight scene. Pacific Rim is over two hours long and it shouldn't have been. There were times I got a little impatient waiting for the action to pick up again.
That's not to say if the characters were interesting or their development was done well it wouldn't have been appreciated though. They behave in ways that make no sense or have no motivation behind. There's another Jaeger pilot that absolutely hates Becket for no real reason. They're working together to stop the apocalypse (oh, and we'll get to the "cancelling the apocalypse" thing), so you'd think they'd have some kind of bond or camaraderie. There's a pair of scientists played by Charlie Day and Burn (Burn?) Gorman, that were meant as comic relief, but their antics and behavior were plain silly. I did enjoy Charlie Day though, but that's probably due to more to being a fan of his in general. Ron Perlman has a small role as this ridiculous black market seller of Kaiju parts that I couldn't help but laugh at, but not in a good way. There's a lot of unintentional humor, and I didn't seem to be alone in laughing at the film. At least this will make for a great Rifftrax.
The characters are so one-dimensional that many of them aren't even referred by name. Even Charlie Hunnam's character is only mentioned by his last name, and he only ever referred to his brother as "my brother". When the credits rolled, we were surprised to see they were named Raleigh and Yancy. This also gave us a laugh, because aren't these girls names? Why go through the trouble of coming up with unusual names for your characters if you don't bother using them? Anyway...
Nearly everything about the plot is telegraphed. It's every action cliche you can imagine. There's even a young, aspiring Jaeger pilot, Mako (Rinko Kikuchi), who is the best candidate to be Becket's partner, but Idris Elba won't let her. There's a relationship between the two of them that's undeveloped as well, but the whole thing seemed like a pointless conflict and build up, as we all know she's going to end up in a Jaeger at some point. Many parts of the film very melodramatic.
The dialog is pretty terrible, and it's not just that it's awful, but it's how it's delivered. Characters shout for no reason. Charlie Hunnam had a constant sneer even when he didn't have a reason to be angry. Idris Elba at one point says, "don't let my calm demeanor fool you", yet he was one of the guys shouting most of his dialog. I didn't find him calm. Everyone seemed to be way overdoing it and it felt very cartoonish. Maybe that's what Guillermo del Toro was going for with all the overacting and melodrama, to evoke those kinds of shows and cartoons that are silly and overdone. I was just a little disappointed to see someone like Idris Elba made to look like an average actor. If this was your first experience with him, you'd wonder what the big deal was. You could say that about almost everyone in the film though.
Regarding all the shouting, I'm not sure if this was a problem with the film's sound mix or the theater I saw it in, but a lot of the dialog had an echo which also made it hard to make out. Much of the dialog I couldn't understand because it was drowned out by other noise in the film.
Now it's time to "Cancel the Apocalypse". I'm really getting tired of the trope of the dramatic, motivational speech that happens just before the climax. It's unnecessary most of the time, but in an effort to not sound like all other speeches, they say things that aren't very natural. In Pacific Rim, Idris Elba is forced to deliver an uninspired speech where he says, "Today, we cancel the apocalypse!" If they make Pacific Rim 2, is someone going to say, "Tonight, we reschedule the Doomsday to a date to be determined later!" Please let this happen. My friend was starting to comment about the length of the film, and was unsure how much time we had left, so I said, "Well, he hasn't cancelled the apocalypse yet, so we still have a ways to go." Then when the scene finally started, I sat up and said, "Oh sweet, he's about to cancel the apocalypse!" It's a good thing the theater was mostly empty. Lastly, I thought it was funny that you hear someone say in the film that it was a good speech. It wasn't.
Pacific Rim is light on story, cheesy, over-acted, and terribly written. You might think then that I hated it, but you're wrong! It's still very entertaining and a lot of fun. It absolutely delivers on the giant robots vs. monsters mayhem that was advertised. The kid in me was delighted by what I saw, but still came away a little disappointed that it could have been more. If you don't want anything beyond some mindless and great looking action, or are someone like me that needs your Godzilla fix, then it's definitely worth a matinee.
3 (out of 5) Death Stars
Showing posts with label Guillermo del Toro. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Guillermo del Toro. Show all posts
Friday, July 12, 2013
Friday, January 18, 2013
Mama (2013) - Movie Review
Yo Mama's so dumb that...um...that's all I got. This is why I'm not a stand-up comedian.
I know a lot of people really like Guillermo del Toro, but I'm starting to think his name attached to a movie is a sign that it's either going to be over-hyped, or it never sees the light of day. Mama was only produced by del Toro, but he got behind the project after seeing a short film by Andrés and Barbara Muschietti. For the feature film, Andrés directed and shared writing credit with Barbara and Neil Cross. Neil Cross you may know as the writer and director of Luther, which is an awesome BBC that I highly recommend you all check out, especially if you like Idris Elba. The fact Neil Cross was involved in the writing disappoints me all that much more with how this played out, but we'll get to that.
If you're interested, you can watch the original Mama short below. Don't worry, it won't spoil anything about the movie to watch it. It's mainly a version of a few things you saw in the trailer and doesn't have any of the story of the movie.
Mama has a tragic, effective setup. A man kills his wife (along with some co-workers) and kidnaps their two daughters. While speeding away on an icy road, they crash in the woods, and find small cabin. I thought this abandoned cabin was a little unusual as it seemed to be in pretty good condition, and looked like it was decorated in the late 1960's or early 70's. As the father is preparing to kill his kids, something intervenes and takes him away. Right away, this kind of surprised me as the evil in the movie is already revealed, and you have a good idea of what it looks like and know it can interact physically with the outside world.
The kids are left to fend for their own, but we all know that this 'Mama' is watching over them. Five years pass, and we meet Lucas (Nikolaj Coster-Waldau) the twin brother of the man from the opening scene. He's been spending every dime he has trying to find any trace of his brother or nieces. I'm a little surprised it took five years to find them considering you'd think the police would have been looking for him, and his car couldn't have crashed that far from the road. Anyway, the kids are found in a feral state. The older of the two, Victoria (Megan Charpentier), was old enough when abandoned that she at least had some speech skills and remembers her father. However, the younger of the two, Lilly (Isabelle Nélisse), was too young to remember her parents and was raised only by her older sister and Mama.
After a short time of being studied by a psychiatrist Dr. Dreyfuss (Daniel Kash), the kids are sent home with Lucas and his rocker girlfriend Annabel (Jessica Chastain). This was another unusual part of the film for me as Lucas and Annabel didn't have the funds to watch over the kids, but Dr. Dreyfuss puts them up in a house with the condition that he's allowed to still study them. It's not long before weird things happen around the house. Lucas is actually knocked into a coma really early on into the film, which leaves Annabel to watch the kids on her own, and she's already established that having kids isn't high on her list of things she wants.
Jessica Chastain, fresh of her Golden Globe win, elevates the material, but I felt like her character was a little too cliched. She plays bass in a band, all tatted up, and everything is dark about her. The fact that she was a musician in no way played into the plot at all. I did like the fact that her arc involved her getting over the fact she didn't want kids, but was forced to watch them and eventually bond and become a parental figure to them.
I also thought Megan Charpentier and Isabelle Nélisse were very good. There's a nice contrast between watching Victoria slowly acclimate back to normal life, while you can tell that something isn't right about Lilly. Lilly is eerie without having to say anything. The interaction between the two was kind of heartbreaking, especially towards the end.
Is Mama scary? Not really. The setup works for a bit and there are some good jump-scares, but the movie starts to rely on those too much. It's also a case of taking too long to get to the point. The more they reveal, the less effective it comes. The effects for Mama initially looked good, but it eventually turns into a really bad CG effect that took away anything that was scary about her. Towards the end people were laughing out loud at the events that played out, rather than being scared. These are the same people that were jumping early on.
It just all falls apart at the end. There are a lot of plot holes, and character decisions that didn't make any sense. They introduce things that aren't really followed up on, or would have resolved the movie sooner if they had been. Plus, there are some conveniences at the end that make it tie up too neatly. They try to explain why Mama was doing what she was doing, and it attempts to make her sympathetic, but I didn't feel that way. I won't spoil the end, but it had this almost fairy tale quality to it that just didn't fit the tone of the film. I also don't like it when a movie isn't consistent about it's mythology. Sometimes Mama is real, other times she's intangible, and it's not like she's invisible or can't be heard. Everyone is powerless to stop her, so why is there even a setup to what she's doing? She can get what she wants at any time.
Mama has an effective setup and some creepy moments, but the more they reveal, the more it falls apart. Sometimes it's better to leave things to the imagination, and that's probably Mama's biggest flaw. What could have been an effective ghost story, ended up being a really uneven film with an ending that didn't fit. It does have some strong performances, but that's about the most I can say about it. This is a rental.
2.5 (out of 5) Death Stars
I know a lot of people really like Guillermo del Toro, but I'm starting to think his name attached to a movie is a sign that it's either going to be over-hyped, or it never sees the light of day. Mama was only produced by del Toro, but he got behind the project after seeing a short film by Andrés and Barbara Muschietti. For the feature film, Andrés directed and shared writing credit with Barbara and Neil Cross. Neil Cross you may know as the writer and director of Luther, which is an awesome BBC that I highly recommend you all check out, especially if you like Idris Elba. The fact Neil Cross was involved in the writing disappoints me all that much more with how this played out, but we'll get to that.
If you're interested, you can watch the original Mama short below. Don't worry, it won't spoil anything about the movie to watch it. It's mainly a version of a few things you saw in the trailer and doesn't have any of the story of the movie.
Mama has a tragic, effective setup. A man kills his wife (along with some co-workers) and kidnaps their two daughters. While speeding away on an icy road, they crash in the woods, and find small cabin. I thought this abandoned cabin was a little unusual as it seemed to be in pretty good condition, and looked like it was decorated in the late 1960's or early 70's. As the father is preparing to kill his kids, something intervenes and takes him away. Right away, this kind of surprised me as the evil in the movie is already revealed, and you have a good idea of what it looks like and know it can interact physically with the outside world.
The kids are left to fend for their own, but we all know that this 'Mama' is watching over them. Five years pass, and we meet Lucas (Nikolaj Coster-Waldau) the twin brother of the man from the opening scene. He's been spending every dime he has trying to find any trace of his brother or nieces. I'm a little surprised it took five years to find them considering you'd think the police would have been looking for him, and his car couldn't have crashed that far from the road. Anyway, the kids are found in a feral state. The older of the two, Victoria (Megan Charpentier), was old enough when abandoned that she at least had some speech skills and remembers her father. However, the younger of the two, Lilly (Isabelle Nélisse), was too young to remember her parents and was raised only by her older sister and Mama.
After a short time of being studied by a psychiatrist Dr. Dreyfuss (Daniel Kash), the kids are sent home with Lucas and his rocker girlfriend Annabel (Jessica Chastain). This was another unusual part of the film for me as Lucas and Annabel didn't have the funds to watch over the kids, but Dr. Dreyfuss puts them up in a house with the condition that he's allowed to still study them. It's not long before weird things happen around the house. Lucas is actually knocked into a coma really early on into the film, which leaves Annabel to watch the kids on her own, and she's already established that having kids isn't high on her list of things she wants.
Jessica Chastain, fresh of her Golden Globe win, elevates the material, but I felt like her character was a little too cliched. She plays bass in a band, all tatted up, and everything is dark about her. The fact that she was a musician in no way played into the plot at all. I did like the fact that her arc involved her getting over the fact she didn't want kids, but was forced to watch them and eventually bond and become a parental figure to them.
I also thought Megan Charpentier and Isabelle Nélisse were very good. There's a nice contrast between watching Victoria slowly acclimate back to normal life, while you can tell that something isn't right about Lilly. Lilly is eerie without having to say anything. The interaction between the two was kind of heartbreaking, especially towards the end.
Is Mama scary? Not really. The setup works for a bit and there are some good jump-scares, but the movie starts to rely on those too much. It's also a case of taking too long to get to the point. The more they reveal, the less effective it comes. The effects for Mama initially looked good, but it eventually turns into a really bad CG effect that took away anything that was scary about her. Towards the end people were laughing out loud at the events that played out, rather than being scared. These are the same people that were jumping early on.
It just all falls apart at the end. There are a lot of plot holes, and character decisions that didn't make any sense. They introduce things that aren't really followed up on, or would have resolved the movie sooner if they had been. Plus, there are some conveniences at the end that make it tie up too neatly. They try to explain why Mama was doing what she was doing, and it attempts to make her sympathetic, but I didn't feel that way. I won't spoil the end, but it had this almost fairy tale quality to it that just didn't fit the tone of the film. I also don't like it when a movie isn't consistent about it's mythology. Sometimes Mama is real, other times she's intangible, and it's not like she's invisible or can't be heard. Everyone is powerless to stop her, so why is there even a setup to what she's doing? She can get what she wants at any time.
Mama has an effective setup and some creepy moments, but the more they reveal, the more it falls apart. Sometimes it's better to leave things to the imagination, and that's probably Mama's biggest flaw. What could have been an effective ghost story, ended up being a really uneven film with an ending that didn't fit. It does have some strong performances, but that's about the most I can say about it. This is a rental.
2.5 (out of 5) Death Stars
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

