Indeed he is powerful, as the Emperor has foreseen...
We haven't had a great start to 2013, but the one exception so far has been with movies related to fantasy elements. Much like how last week Jack and the Giant Slayer was an example of the reimaging of a classic story that worked (even though I wasn't in love with it), Oz the Great and Powerful is an example of a 'prequel' that expands on a classic story without stepping on the toes of the original.
Oscar (James Franco), who has maybe the longest full name in movie history, so he just goes by "Oz", is a magician in a travelling circus. He's also a selfish con-man and womanizer that treats his friends poorly. While Oz has his charms, he isn't exactly the most likable guy in the world. Despite this, you do get some entertainment value from watching Oz try to bullshit his way through a situation or into a woman's undergarments. The latter gets him into to trouble and he's forced to flee the circus in a hot air balloon, but the bad luck piles on as he's immediately caught in a tornado and whisked away to the land of Oz.
Upon arriving, he's greeted by the witch Theodora (Mila Kunis), who tells Oz the prophecy of a wizard that will save them from a wicked witch. Theodora believes Oz is that wizard, but her sister Evanora (Rachel Weisz) isn't convinced. Even Oz himself doesn't believe he has what it takes, but goes along with it due to the huge fortune he stands to gain, as well as the chance to hook up with either Theordora or Evanora. I can't say I blame him on that second part at all. Oz heads out on a quest to stop the Wicked Witch, joined by Finley, a flying monkey that pledges himself to Oz (and voiced by Zach Braff), and a small china doll (voiced by Joey King).
It's best to stop there are there a few twists and plot developments that caught me by surprise, but fans more intimate with The Wizard of Oz may figure these things out before I did.
What made Oz the Great and Powerful fun to watch was that there were a lot of nice little touches and callbacks to the original The Wizard of Oz without being totally obvious or winking at the audience when doing it. It does a really good job of being respectful to the original Oz while managing to feel like an original story on it's own. For younger audiences I think this will serve to get them more interested in the other stories of Oz and watch those as well.
Oz... is an absolutely gorgeous film. The visuals play out like the trailer, starting in black and white with a 4:3 aspect ratio. This part of the film had a much older, classic look to it. When we arrive in Oz the color palate opens up and the screen expands to its full size. The world they created was very vibrant and colorful, with tons of details in every scene and there was always something interesting to look at on screen. I often found myself distracted by something in the background, and had that take my attention to the point where I almost lost track of what was going on. The effects were top notch throughout the film, and the look and animation of China Girl was particularly impressive to me. However, there were a few times it looked a little too CG-ish. This may have been due to the 3D or the fact that I saw it on IMAX and didn't sit close enough to the middle, so sometimes things were blurry or looked off. I did think this had really good use of 3D, and it's a time where I don't think seeing it in 3D would be a total waste. There's a great waterfall sequence where you really feel how the 3D immersed you into the action, and you can also see how this will likely end up a ride at Disneyland. Unless you can get there early for IMAX and get a seat in the middle, I'd recommend just standard 3D though.
Another thing that looked a little odd to me was the makeup for the Wicked Witch. It was too clean or new looking, which I guess makes sense since this is her origin and she's younger, but I thought maybe a little more dirt or grime would have helped.
The cast all seemed to be having a blast. I wasn't sure if James Franco was the right choice for the lead role, but my doubts quickly dissolved. He really owned the role and was able to use his comedic chops to ham it up when needed. I also think Rachel Weisz was really great as Evanora. She's always been one of those actresses that's hard to take your eyes off of, but here I think she was having a lot of fun and chewing up a little bit of scenery. Mila Kunis and Michelle Williams were also very good, but I can't say too much about them without revealing too much about their characters.
I was more impressed with the voice acting, Zach Braff in particular. While I've always liked Braff (I'm a HUGE Scrubs fan), I've never thought anything of his voice until now. He really does have a perfect voice for animated characters, and I thought his work for Finely was spot on and very funny. I was also impressed by Joey King's voice work as China Girl. There's a lot of emotion in her voice, and I would have guessed that the work was done by an older, more experienced actress.
One thing that caught be by surprise was that I genuinely didn't know this was directed by Sam Raimi until the opening credits. That automatically made perk up a bit and take notice of certain things. You could definitely feel Raimi's influence with some of the subtle humor and occasional scares, but otherwise it didn't feel like a Sam Raimi film. In a lot of ways this may remind you of Tim Burton's Alice in Wonderland, especially since Danny Elfman did the soundtrack, but Raimi out-Burtoned Tim Burton. And yes, as with all Raimi films, there is a Bruce Campbell appearance.
The script by Mitchell Kapner and David Lindsay-Abaire has a little something for everyone. There's humor that only adults will pick up on, and things that are a little more for the kids. I heard lots of chuckles throughout the film, so it definitely has a broad appeal. While it is PG, there are a few good jump scares that caught me by surprise, so you might need to be careful with the really young kids, but I don't think it's anything that's going to give them nightmares.
Oz the Great and Powerful is a fun film that the whole family can enjoy together. The visuals are outstanding, and there's plenty of humor and good performances across the board. Enough respect is given to the source material, while creating a world that still feels fresh. Older fans of Oz should enjoy this as well as introduce a new generation to it. I highly recommend checking it out.
3.5 (out of 5) Death Stars
Showing posts with label Rachel Weisz. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rachel Weisz. Show all posts
Friday, March 8, 2013
Saturday, August 11, 2012
The Bourne Legacy (2012) - Movie Review
Rental month continues with the latest installment to the Bourne franchise. I guess it would have to be a franchise now, as The Bourne Legacy is neither a reboot nor a direct sequel to The Bourne Ultimatum. The events of Legacy seem to take place around the same time of the events of Ultimatum, but I'm not entirely positive of that, as it's been a while since I've seen any of the previous Bourne films. In fact, I would strongly recommend that you refresh with at least Ultimatum before seeing Legacy if you have the time.
The movie starts with a shot of Jeremy Renner as Aaron Cross in the mountains retrieving an object. Then, you're taken back to Stacy Keach and Edward Norton talking about shutting programs down and containment. There are lots of callbacks and references to the previous films as they are doing this. There are tons of code names and terms being thrown arond and it was tough to keep it all straight without a cheat sheet or something. This goes on for a large portion of this 135 minute movie. At times I felt like you could have called this The Bourne Meeting. It really felt like much of this movie was Edward Norton's character talking about shutting things down, ordering people around and trying to do damage control.
While this managed to keep my interest, since it is a good cast and it's well acted, I kept wondering when they were just going to get on with it. There are very few action sequences in the entire movie and most of the early scenes with Aaron Cross are very short. It's not until almost the last 20-30 minutes until it really takes off. I just wish there had been more of it or maybe quickened the pace the first hour or so. They simply took too much time to tell the story they did.
Cross's main motivation in the film is to get more chemicals. They explain that there are two types of chemicals these agents take: a green pill and a blue pill. Once enhances the body, and the other their mind. The catch is, if you don't take them at regular intervals or run out, your abilities degrade rapidly. They mention these 'chems' a lot, and with all this talk of greens and blues, I couldn't shake the craving for M&M's throughout the film. I had to pick up a bag after the movie. Bring M&M's if you plan on seeing this.
Anyway, so Cross runs out of drugs and is simply trying to get more so he can retain his abilities. That's it. He's not trying to expose anyone, there's nobody he wants to kill, or anything like that. This leads him to seek out Rachel Weisz, one of the scientists that used to do work with the agents. Weisz is also on the run once the cover up operation is in effect and everyone starts getting killed.
What keeps your interest are all the performances. Jeremy Renner is focused as Cross. Renner is one of those actors that you just can't take your eyes off of even when he's not saying anything. The scenes with him and Weisz were very interesting. Edward Norton was good too, but they didn't really give him much to do and it kind of felt like he was just playing Edward Norton. There's not much to any of these people as far as character development or personality.
It's unusual that this is called The Bourne Legacy when the screenplay by Tony and Dan Gilroy (Tony also directed) has very little to do with the the actual Bourne book of the same name. The story is after the original director backed out of Legacy, Matt Damon did too - MATT DAMON! - so they went back to the drawing board and decided to do another movie set in the same universe, but not actually about Jason Bourne. I actually don't mind that they did this. It opens up the possibility of bringing in other actors or going down different paths if they do additional movies. At the same time, they could have simply continued with the Bourne story and just cast different actors, similar to what they do with Bond. Oh well...
While I don't think The Bourne Legacy is a bad movie, I was a little disappointed. It's strong cast keeps you interested, but there's too much behind the scenes action and not enough focus on the main character. It's slowly paced and doesn't have the same punch (literally) as the previous films. This is something much better suited for a rental.
3 (out of 5) Death Stars
The movie starts with a shot of Jeremy Renner as Aaron Cross in the mountains retrieving an object. Then, you're taken back to Stacy Keach and Edward Norton talking about shutting programs down and containment. There are lots of callbacks and references to the previous films as they are doing this. There are tons of code names and terms being thrown arond and it was tough to keep it all straight without a cheat sheet or something. This goes on for a large portion of this 135 minute movie. At times I felt like you could have called this The Bourne Meeting. It really felt like much of this movie was Edward Norton's character talking about shutting things down, ordering people around and trying to do damage control.
While this managed to keep my interest, since it is a good cast and it's well acted, I kept wondering when they were just going to get on with it. There are very few action sequences in the entire movie and most of the early scenes with Aaron Cross are very short. It's not until almost the last 20-30 minutes until it really takes off. I just wish there had been more of it or maybe quickened the pace the first hour or so. They simply took too much time to tell the story they did.
Cross's main motivation in the film is to get more chemicals. They explain that there are two types of chemicals these agents take: a green pill and a blue pill. Once enhances the body, and the other their mind. The catch is, if you don't take them at regular intervals or run out, your abilities degrade rapidly. They mention these 'chems' a lot, and with all this talk of greens and blues, I couldn't shake the craving for M&M's throughout the film. I had to pick up a bag after the movie. Bring M&M's if you plan on seeing this.
Anyway, so Cross runs out of drugs and is simply trying to get more so he can retain his abilities. That's it. He's not trying to expose anyone, there's nobody he wants to kill, or anything like that. This leads him to seek out Rachel Weisz, one of the scientists that used to do work with the agents. Weisz is also on the run once the cover up operation is in effect and everyone starts getting killed.
What keeps your interest are all the performances. Jeremy Renner is focused as Cross. Renner is one of those actors that you just can't take your eyes off of even when he's not saying anything. The scenes with him and Weisz were very interesting. Edward Norton was good too, but they didn't really give him much to do and it kind of felt like he was just playing Edward Norton. There's not much to any of these people as far as character development or personality.
It's unusual that this is called The Bourne Legacy when the screenplay by Tony and Dan Gilroy (Tony also directed) has very little to do with the the actual Bourne book of the same name. The story is after the original director backed out of Legacy, Matt Damon did too - MATT DAMON! - so they went back to the drawing board and decided to do another movie set in the same universe, but not actually about Jason Bourne. I actually don't mind that they did this. It opens up the possibility of bringing in other actors or going down different paths if they do additional movies. At the same time, they could have simply continued with the Bourne story and just cast different actors, similar to what they do with Bond. Oh well...
While I don't think The Bourne Legacy is a bad movie, I was a little disappointed. It's strong cast keeps you interested, but there's too much behind the scenes action and not enough focus on the main character. It's slowly paced and doesn't have the same punch (literally) as the previous films. This is something much better suited for a rental.
3 (out of 5) Death Stars
Labels:
Corey Stoll,
Dan Gilroy,
David Strathairn,
Edward Norton,
Eric Van Lustbader,
Jeremy Renner,
Joan Allen,
Matt Damon,
Rachel Weisz,
Scott Glenn,
Stacy Keach,
The Bourne Legacy,
Tony Gilroy,
Zeljko Ivanek
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

